BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brett Winches <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:38:37 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (112 lines)
Redundant but still worth keeping around for a while.  On the other hand
I have not worn a wrist watch for seven years in March of 2008.     


###
BRETT WINCHESTER
[log in to unmask] 
208-639-8386
###


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Colin McDonald
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 6:28 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: wwv

useful, but perhaps redundant.
73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brett Winches" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: wwv


> The 10 mhz is still a valid calibration source for some purposes (not
> time related.)  yes many other uses have changed to the other modes
but
> the hf is still useful.  =20
>
>
> ###
> BRETT WINCHESTER
> [log in to unmask]
> 208-639-8386
> ###
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Colin McDonald
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 6:05 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: wwv
>
> well, they could take away the regular HF wwv service and your clock
> would still work....the wwv that is used for the atomic clocks or the
> WWV clocks is at 60kilihertz I believe.
> I am fairly sure that anyone who isn't near a computer that needs K
> index info, or weather info, is going to probably have that info
> availible via satelite these days anyway.
> So, the 5, 10 and 15MHZ wwv services could probably be done away with
> and there would be no significant consequence to it.
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William Sallander" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 5:31 PM
> Subject: Re: wwv
>
>
> > Hello Walter, I did some checking on google but I didn't come up
with
> > anything concreat.
> > I don't believe that they will take it off the air since alot of
> devices
> > still depend on the signal for time purposes and other uses.
> >
> > I hope they don't take it off the air because I just bought a clock
> that
> > sets it self via WWV.
> >
> > 73
> >
> > Bill, N3ETC
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----=20
> > From: "Walter Hampton" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 9:21 PM
> > Subject: wwv
> >
> >
> > > are they going to off wwv? i hope not. i heard it on the handiham
> net. =3D
> > > please let me know if it is true.=3D20
> > >
> > > walter wb6jtj
> >
> >
> > --=20
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.6/1086 - Release Date:
> 10/22/2007 7:57 PM
> >
> >
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.6/1086 - Release Date:
10/22/2007 7:57 PM
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2