Try a icom 706 MK II G with the SM-20, the better sounding Kenwoods are
about all that will beat that combination. I know some one who runs that
setup.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: ts480
> Tom,
>
> Why don't you stop by 3976 some time and listen to Jim, QLR. The audio on
> the
> 480 is outstanding; maybe a notch below the 2000 or 756, but certainly
> better
> than the 706MK3.
>
>
> Steve
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 4:42 PM
> Subject: Re: ts480
>
>
> Guys:
>
> Is the transmit audio on the TS480 really bad?
>
> Am I going to be disappointed in it if I take the plunge and get this
> radio?
>
> How does it compare to the transmit audio of say the IC706 or IC718?
>
> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 4:36 PM
> Subject: Re: ts480
>
>
>> Hi Anthony,
>>
>> It's the only problem I have with the radio. At times like this, I wish
>> I
>> was skilled enough with a soldering iron to modify the filter myself. It
>> shouldn't be a big deal for anyone who knows what they're doing, so I
>> wonder
>> why nobody has tried it yet.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 17:48
>> Subject: Re: ts480
>>
>>
>>> Hi Steve;
>>>
>>> Your absolutely right.
>>>
>>> I mean the transmit audio is just not what I'm accustomed to hearing.
>>>
>>> Anthony
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:57 AM
>>> Subject: Re: ts480
>>>
>>>
>>>> Anthony,
>>>>
>>>> The problem with the TX audio is that the widest filter you have on SSB
>>>> is
>>>> 2.4KHz. To me, that's the most important difference between the TS480
>>>> and
>>>> the TS2000. I wish somebody would come up with a mod for changing that
>>>> filter width.
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 17:49
>>>> Subject: Re: ts480
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Richard;
>>>>>
>>>>> You can really get away without the filters.
>>>>>
>>>>> First of all, the filters have to be soldered in.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you believe it in this day an age?
>>>>>
>>>>> When I had mine I didn't find I needed the filters.
>>>>>
>>>>> My main complaint with the radio is that the audio output from the
>>>>> transmitter does not have that Kenwood footprint.
>>>>>
>>>>> Even with the software, I wasn't able to open the audio out to 3.0
>>>>>
>>>>> As I said in an earlier post, I'm going to wait and see what Kenwood
>>>>> comes
>>>>> out with next.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73 De Anthony W2AJV
>>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>> ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:57 AM
>>>>> Subject: ts480
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Tom and list;
>>>>>> I believe wires four and five are reversed for the ts480. I have
>>>>>> heard
>>>>>> rf
>>>>>> complaints concerning the mc60 and wonder what else works well.
>>>>>> As for the 480, I have generally purchased new radios and had the
>>>>>> seller
>>>>>> install voice board and filters. Lazy I admit it. I have seen a few
>>>>>> ts480s
>>>>>> used and wonder how much of a pain filter and speech installation is?
>>>>>> Most
>>>>>> used ones are just the radios no filters and no speech.
>>>>>> Richard
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
|
