I'm interested in the 70 cm version.  Do you have a link?
Have you tried the software. I've tried it with window-eyes and appears 
to be totally mouse driven.
bummer!!!
73s
Butch Bussen
wa0vjr

On Wed, 17 Oct 
2007, Frederick wrote:

> Hi
>     Well, with $31 shipping I paid $81 for my 70 centimeter version. I am
> still trying to figure out how to set the CTCSS manually but other than this
> I am loving it!
>
> God bless,
> Mark
> God loves you!
> My ham radio lists.
> http://lists.topica.com/lists/funhamradio.
> http://groups.google.com/group/funhamradio-list
> My personal website
> http://funhamradio.bloki.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 8:09 AM
> Subject: Re: got the puxing today
>
>
>> Where did you find this for $40.00?  Last I looked they were around
>> $70.00.
>>
>> Keep me posted, I'm considering getting a 440 version.  What size is
>> this thing?  What familiar model could you compare it to as far as
>> physical size?
>> Thanks.
>> 73s
>> Butch Bussen
>> wa0vjr
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Gary Lee wrote:
>>
>>> Got a friend to help me get the voice up and running.
>>> It is pre-recorded human speech.  Very heavily accented but =
>>> understandable.
>>> Haven't figured out how to set pl tones yet, but have managed to set up =
>>> an offset.
>>> I will do a full write up when I get it all figured out.
>>> Currently, the tones do not talk, and memory programming is tricky.  =
>>> Also, haven't found a way to read what frequency you are on or other =
>>> info directly from the display.
>>> However, its a decent start.  Now one must wonder, if a chinese company =
>>> of unknown engineering talent and capitalization can do this for such a =
>>> low price, ($41.00 +$45.00 shipping), Where are kenwood, yaesu, and icom
>>> =
>>> with their million dollar engineering staffs, and state of the art =
>>> manufacturing facilities?=20
>>> We need tto find a way to ask this question more forcefully.
>>>
>>> 73, will write when I have more info.
>>>
>>
>>
>