BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: cape cod
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:57:54 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (71 lines) 
yup, that's the same here.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: cape cod


> yes, and the regs also state, at least here, and i am assuming there is
> similar language in the regs in the states, that the other users of the 
> 70CM
> amateur band must accept interpherence on said band from other users, that
> being the amateur operators, without complaint or recourse.
> I guess the military is over and above communication regulations?  I would
> agree that malicious interpherence is one thing and that it is illegal no
> matter who is creating it. however, operating legal stations, with all
> transmitters and receivers within standardized parameters, which means
> sperious emitions are kept with in regulated parameters, is not malicious
> interpherence and therefore any other user, IE the military, cannot force
> amateur operators to lower power or seace transmitting, unless it can be
> proven to directly inhibit operations dealing with national secuirty, or 
> if
> it compremises confidential information.
> Which, it doesn't since all matters dealing with national security and
> confidential information are transmitted and received via satelite and
> networked computer systems these days.
> Anyway, my two sents here and perhaps totally off target anyway.
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Brett Winches" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 2:12 PM
> Subject: Re: cape cod
>
>
>> We are secondary users of that band uhf that is.=20
>>
>>
>> ###
>> BRETT WINCHESTER
>> [log in to unmask]
>> 208-639-8386
>> ###
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of mike
>> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 1:57 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: cape cod
>>
>> So we have to suffer for their FAULTY equipment. Typical dumb government
>>
>> =20
>>
>> mike
>>
>> amature call M0DMD
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.10/908 - Release Date: 
>> 7/19/2007
> 6:10 PM
>>
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2