Nether did I except to fid out where the remote receiver input was as I
had a loop for a time for low noise receiving on .1.8 MHz.
###
BRETT WINCHESTER
[log in to unmask]
208-639-8386
###
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lou Kline
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 7:43 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: tuner
Hi Brett.
One of those sockets is to control the AT250 auto tuner. I do not
recall, however if it used the same format as the connectors on later
radios did. I do recall that you could control an AT250 from the
Kenwood TS680S, so it wouldn't surprise me if they used that same
connector format for the auto tuner all the way up through. Of course,
that is more speculation on my part than anything. I only have definite
knowledge about the radios made from the early 1990's on. Not that I
wasn't around for the Kenwood TS430S, because I was, and I did own one
for a couple of years. I just never paid close attention to the
accessory plugs on the back of the radio!
73, de Lou K2LKK
At 09:23 AM 7/5/2007 -0600, you wrote:
>My Kenwood ts430 has power on one of the accessory plugs for a variety
>of purposes.=20
>
>
>###
>BRETT WINCHESTER
>[log in to unmask]
>208-639-8386
>###
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: For blind ham radio operators
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Miller
>Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7:36 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: tuner
>
>I actually think the LDG is better than the 180, as do many, which is
>why I never bought the at180. I know the 735 has that hookup in the
>back, not sure what year that is, but the 761 icom, I don't recall
>seeing it on that radio in the local EOC though it might have just been
>missed.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Lou Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 8:31 PM
>Subject: Re: tuner
>
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > I suspect that it might pre-date that as that was a 1980's radio.
> > =20 But, that was what I was alluding to in my last message.
> >
> > I'm not sure when Icom started doing that, but I know that both
> > my=20 TS690S and my TS2000S will support the Kenwood interface. I
> > never=20 bought the Icom interface for the MFJ because I always
> > found the Icom=20 AT180 to be sufficient. Of course, it should be
> > for what Icom asks=20 for those kiddos.
> >
> > 73, de Lou K2LKK
> >
> >
> >
> > At 05:15 PM 7/3/2007 -0400, you wrote:
> >>I'd wonder if you can get a cable like the one for the 706 where
> >>you=20 can hook it right to the radio, that's slick but I don't know
> >>if your=20 radio has the tuner hookup on the back.
> >>----- Original Message -----
> >>From: "Gery Gaubert" <[log in to unmask]>
> >>To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >>Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 4:58 PM
> >>Subject: tuner
> >>
> >>
> >> >I got the tuner in. I was surprised that it didn't come with an
> >> >ac
>
> >> >adaptor like the tw-01 watt meter. I'll get someone with vision
> >> >to
>
> >> >assist mein connecting it. o I=3D20
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>No virus found in this incoming message.
> >>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/885 - Release Date:=20
> >>7/3/2007
> >>10:02 AM
> >
> > Louis Kim Kline
> > A.R.S. K2LKK
> > Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> > Work e-mail: [log in to unmask] Work Telephone: (585)
> > 697-5753
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.0/887 - Release Date:
>7/5/2007
>1:55 PM
Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone: (585) 697-5753
|
