BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:41:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
I never really liked window eyes though I"ve tried it a few times over the 
years. I do think Kurzweil is better than openbook as well for my uses.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: Information regarding the JAWS 9 SMA shipment in theUnited 
States


> Hi Eric;
>
> I wanted to try WindowEyes however, I am not able to break the habit of
> certain key strokes.
>
> 73 De Anthony W2AJV
> [log in to unmask]
> ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Eric Clegg" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 1:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Information regarding the JAWS 9 SMA shipment in theUnited
> States
>
>
>> Hi Lou,
>> I work as a state employee here in Sacramento.
>>
>> My agency seems to be wedded to Freedom Scientific.
>>
>> I wish they'd also consider Kurzweil instead of Open Book.
>>
>> I think I'm going to give myself Window-Eyes as a Christmas present for
>> use
>> at home.
>>
>> Eric
>> KU3I
>>
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2