BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:50:17 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (89 lines)
As long as the prophets come in, they don't care.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lou Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: Information regarding the JAWS 9 SMA shipment in theUnited 
States


> Hi.
>
> I frankly don't know what Freedom Scientific would do for trouble if they
> didn't have their ILM authorization scheme.  I find ILM problems to be
> responsible for about 80% of the support problems that we have with video
> intercept problems making up about another 15% of the problems.  I just
> wonder how many more times they have to shoot themselves in the foot 
> before
> they figure out that it isn't worth it.
>
> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>
>
>
> At 11:48 PM 11/23/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>>Mine said 0 as well but when I went to the FS activate site it correctly
>>said I had 1 left and I got 9.0.
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 11:33 PM
>>Subject: Re: Information regarding the JAWS 9 SMA shipment in theUnited
>>States
>>
>>
>> >    Harvey:
>> >
>> > What's the best way to check whether you are entitled to another 
>> > upgrade?
>> >
>> > I did the alt H and A sequence at the Jaws window, and was surprised to
>> > find
>> > that they had me listed for no additional upgrades.
>> >
>> > This is weird, since my University purchased 7.0 for me a little over 2
>> > years ago, at which time I was entitled to the next two upgrades.
>> >
>> > I have written to the tech support folks, but they are not always known
>> > for
>> > their quick response.
>> >
>> > Any help would be suggested here.  I'll also maybe call them on Monday.
>> >
>> > 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Harvey Heagy" <[log in to unmask]>
>> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> > Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 11:20 PM
>> > Subject: Re: Information regarding the JAWS 9 SMA shipment in theUnited
>> > States
>> >
>> >
>> >> Tom, you, Danny and anyone else are both very welcome.  As for myself, 
>> >> I
>> >> don't know if I am entitled to 9.0 or not.  I'll have to check.  73.
>> >> Harvey
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.5/1149 - Release Date:
>>11/24/2007 10:06 AM
>
> Louis Kim Kline
> A.R.S. K2LKK
> Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2