BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: A Replacement for an Icom R71 Receiver 0 for 2 so far.
From:
Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Aug 2007 08:35:15 -0700
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (8 lines) 
What I always thought was funny was the receiver that Kenwood had out about 
the time of the 440 wasn't that much cheaper, only a hundred bucks or so. 
I'd bet it was basically the same as the 440 without transmitting section.

73s
Butch Bussen
wa0vjr

ATOM RSS1 RSS2