BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: RADIO LAW: HAMS WIN MOBILE IN MOTION EXEMPTION IN NEW JERSEY
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:10:51 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines) 
good.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brett Winches" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: RADIO LAW: HAMS WIN MOBILE IN MOTION EXEMPTION IN NEW JERSEY


> You want poor lawyers?  Our welfare system would then for sure crash and
> burn.  =20
> 
> 
> ###
> BRETT WINCHESTER
> [log in to unmask]
> 208-639-8386
> ###
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Harvey Heagy
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 6:02 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: RADIO LAW: HAMS WIN MOBILE IN MOTION EXEMPTION IN NEW
> JERSEY
> 
> Thanks, John, but Anthony is probably right.  If we did that, it would
> put the crybaby liberal democrats out of work; not to mention all the
> shyster lawyers many of whom's suits are nothing more than outright
> extortion.
> Harvey

ATOM RSS1 RSS2