BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:29:23 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (204 lines)
Some laws only deserve contempt that is one 

mike
amature call M0DMD
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Lou Kline
Sent: 17 July 2007 02:34
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: RADIO LAW: HAMS WIN MOBILE IN MOTION EXEMPTION IN NEW JERSEY

I venture to say that that one will be almost universally ignored.  The 
problem with stupid ill considered legislation like that is that it only 
breeds contempt for the law.

--Lou K2LKK



At 07:43 AM 7/16/2007 +0100, you wrote:
>There is no law in the world that would stop me running a broadcast
receiver
>in the car!!!!!!
>
>mike
>amature call M0DMD
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>On Behalf Of Anthony Vece
>Sent: 15 July 2007 22:00
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: RADIO LAW: HAMS WIN MOBILE IN MOTION EXEMPTION IN NEW JERSEY
>
>Hi Steve'
>
>I believe that police and fire fighters are also exempt.
>
>If people acted responsibly, we would not need as many laws.
>
>73 De Anthony W2AJV
>[log in to unmask]
>ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
>
>   ----- Original Message -----=20
>   From: Steve Dresser=20
>   To: [log in to unmask]
>   Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 12:40 AM
>   Subject: Re: RADIO LAW: HAMS WIN MOBILE IN MOTION EXEMPTION IN NEW =
>JERSEY
>
>
>   Anthony,
>
>   Frankly, I'm not sure we should have won that one.  Most of the mobile =
>
>   operation I've heard doesn't even come close to emergency =
>communication, and=20
>   while we may not be quite as bad as the cell phone users cruising =
>along=20
>   while talking, I can't help wondering how attentive anyone using a =
>radio is=20
>   on their driving.
>
>   As an interesting side issue, does the new law prohibit police and =
>fire=20
>   fighters from using their radios while driving?  Certainly they have =
>more=20
>   need for their radios than do we hams.
>
>   Steve
>
>   ----- Original Message -----=20
>   From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
>   To: <[log in to unmask]>
>   Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 20:12
>   Subject: Fw: RADIO LAW: HAMS WIN MOBILE IN MOTION EXEMPTION IN NEW =
>JERSEY
>
>
>   > Hi Everyone;
>   >
>   > In this state, where they make laws so that they may pass laws, we =
>as =3D
>   > ham radio operators finally won one.
>   >
>   > If you do not live in NJ. you can use this law to defeat other laws.
>   >
>   > Sometimes our government really works.
>   >
>   > 73 De Anthony W2AJV
>   > [log in to unmask]
>   > ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
>   >
>   > ----- Original Message -----=3D20
>   > From: DON=3D20
>   > To: Recipient list suppressed:=3D20
>   > Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 5:41 PM
>   > Subject: Fwd: RADIO LAW: HAMS WIN MOBILE IN MOTION EXEMPTION IN NEW =
>=3D
>   > JERSEY
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >  From: [log in to unmask]
>   >  =3D20
>   >
>   >  Hi Don,
>   >  Could you forward this to the club members?=3D20
>   >  Thanks,
>   >  Denise KB3ANO
>   >
>   >  =3D20
>   >  =3D20
>   >  =3D20
>   >  Subject: RADIO LAW: HAMS WIN MOBILE IN MOTION EXEMPTION IN NEW =
>JERSEY
>   >
>   >  =3D20
>   >  RADIO LAW:  HAMS WIN MOBILE IN MOTION EXEMPTION IN NEW JERSEY
>   >
>   >  Amateur Radio has won an important exemption in New Jersey.  One =
>that =3D
>   > should keep the states hams running mobile for a long time. =3D20
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >    New Jersey Assembly Bill A 4146 and Senate Bill S 1099/2764 were =
>=3D
>   > introduced in the New Jersey legislature to restrict cell phone use =
>and =3D
>   > text messaging while driving.  The twin measures were passed on June =
>=3D
>   > 21st   and await the governor's signature.
>   >
>   >
>   >    As originally introduced, the bills would have prohibited the use =
>of =3D
>   > any and all electronic communications devices for talking, listening =
>or =3D
>   > text messaging while driving.  This could have meant that New Jersey =
>=3D
>   > hams would have effectively been banned from operating while mobile =
>in =3D
>   > motion.=3D20
>   >
>   >
>   >    But that won't be the case.  This is because the combined measure =
>as =3D
>   > passed includes a sentence that makes Amateur Radio the only service =
>=3D
>   > exempt from the all inclusive ban.  That hard fought for exemption =
>reads =3D
>   > -- and we quote:  "For the purposes of this section an 'electronic =
>=3D
>   > communication device' shall not include an Amateur Radio".
>   >
>   >
>   >    Talk about getting a broadly worded exemption that covers every =
>=3D
>   > aspect of Amateur Service communications.  More important it means =
>that =3D
>   > use Amateur Radio while driving will continue to be permitted in New =
>=3D
>   > Jersey.  The only caveat is that it is done safely and the ham =
>operator =3D
>   > is not engaging in inattentive driving.
>   >
>   >
>   >    The new law goes into effect four months after the governor signs =
>=3D
>   > it.  From that point on, hams are advised to keep a copy of the =
>measure =3D
>   > and their Amateur Radio license in your glove compartment if you =
>drive =3D
>   > in the Garden State.
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   > =
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
>=3D
>   > -----
>   >
>   >
>   >
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.8/904 - Release Date: 7/16/2007 
>5:42 PM

Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753

ATOM RSS1 RSS2