Well, let's enjoy it while we have it.
We'll see what happens 

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of John Miller
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 1:37 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: 440

I know it has to do with frequency, but a few people say this one should be
right in range. 449.275 I think it is in west Bridgewater MA. That would be
a shame to lose it though the use is limited by the DCS tone.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: 440


> John,
>
> I think the issue is distance from the radar site, and possibly frequency.
> What machine are you referring to?
>
> Steve
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 12:11
> Subject: Re: 440
>
>
>> RI as well has been affected and rumor is they're looking at 1 or 2 
>> machines in CT but I have nothing official on that. I'm still 
>> surprised the 440 machine with the best coverage in MA hasn't been 
>> touched yet when the numbers indicate it should be, I"m wondering if 
>> they're just going after everyone based on an older list at first and 
>> this one has only been up for maybe a year now.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Lou Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 12:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: 440
>>
>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I think this is just a regional issue in California and Massachusetts. 
>>> I
>>> haven't heard anything about closing down the band elsewhere.
>>>
>>> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> At 11:13 AM 12/30/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>>>>I hope not.
>>>>
>>>>I really enjoy 440 especially with an ht.
>>>>
>>>>73 De Anthony W2AJV
>>>>[log in to unmask]
>>>>ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
>>>>
>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>From: "Walter Hampton" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:27 PM
>>>>Subject: 440
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Are we going to lose the 440 cm band? i paid a lot of money for my =
>>>> > radio. k7ij Bruce had to shut off his repeater. what a waste. it sure
>>>> > =
>>>> > makes me mad. all that money. and all the repeaters have to be shut =
>>>> > down. what is next? 2 meters? Whatv is going to happen next to 
>>>> > 440?=20
>>>> >
>>>> > from walter wb6jtj Walter p.s. 440 was, or is a good band.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1206 - Release Date:
>>>>1/1/2008
>>>>12:09 PM
>>>
>>> Louis Kim Kline
>>> A.R.S. K2LKK
>>> Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
>>> Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
>>> Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>