Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:53:21 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The standard may be changing, I hear the Icom 7000 has the same connector as
the 480.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lou Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: some basic questions on the TS480
>I think you are probably better off without the pigtail adaptor. One more
> source of voltage drop. You're probably just better off to use the
> correct
> cord in the first place. I know what you mean though. If you have a
> Kenwood supply from an older rig, it would be nice to just buy the rig and
> use the same old supply. Or, use the same supply for both the Kenwood
> TS2000S and the TS480S if you have the situation that Kevin does. It does
> make you wonder what Kenwood was thinking.
>
> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>
>
>
> At 03:10 PM 10/20/2007 -0700, you wrote:
>>I think you can use a standard shielded network cable for a mike
>>extension. Worse case, you might have to put a choke on it. I've read of
>>other folks using cat five extensions for this with no problems.
>>I really would never consider the 200 watt version, takes more power, only
>>gains you 3 db, and one more thing to go wrong. The only real complaint I
>>have with this radio is Kenwood went to a smaller power connecter, so old
>>power cords won't work. I wish someone made a pig tail adapter for this.
>>73s
>>Butch Bussen
>>wa0vjr
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.5/1084 - Release Date:
>>10/21/2007 3:09 PM
>
> Louis Kim Kline
> A.R.S. K2LKK
> Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> Work Telephone: (585) 697-5740
|
|
|