BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
hank smith <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:21:23 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (88 lines)
then why there trying again?
doesn't make any sense
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: OT now they are moving on to satelite radio


> They tried this one before a couple times and got nowhere with it.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 10:42 AM
> Subject: Re: OT now they are moving on to satelite radio
>
>
>> It's all greed!
>>
>> SUSAN & ANTHONY VECE
>> 20 N. LOGAN AVE.
>> AUDUBON, NJ. 08106-1037
>> HOME PHONE: (856) 310-8323
>> SUSAN'S CELL: (609) 471-2955
>> ANTHONY'S CELL: (609) 471-2662
>> AOL SCREEN NAME: AJV48
>> SKYPE USER NAME: AJV624
>> AMATEUR RADIO CALLSIGN: W2AJV
>> [log in to unmask]
>> ECHOLINK NODE: 74389
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 5:19 AM
>> Subject: OT now they are moving on to satelite radio
>>
>>
>>> Although Cnet news is credited with this It actually comes from the 
>>> Radio
>>> and internet news letter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From CNET News: "The RIAA has already mounted a court challenge against
>>> <http://www.xmradio.com> XM Satellite Radio over gadgets like the 
>>> Pioneer
>>> Inno that allow  <http://www.riaa.com>  <http://www.riaa.com/> riaa
>>> <http://www.riaa.com> consumers to trap individual songs originally
>>> played
>>> on air in alleged violation of copyright.
>>>
>>> "Now the industry group is urging that issue to be one of the deciding
>>> factors xm/sirius?for federal regulators weighing the proposed
>>> multibillion-dollar union of XM and its sole competitor, Sirius 
>>> Satellite
>>> radio...
>>>
>>> "[T]he RIAA said it's concerned that both satellite radio companies have
>>> invested in technologies that allow them to shortchange artists on the
>>> distribution side 'by giving users the ability to download copyrighted
>>> sound
>>> recordings to portable devices, effectively transforming a radio-like
>>> service into a digital distribution subscription service like Rhapsody 
>>> or
>>> Napster.'
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> A merger could bolster those investments and 'seriously threaten the
>>> viability of the music industry as a whole,' the RIAA wrote. The group
>>> also
>>> called on the  <http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9741103-7.html>
>>> <http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9741103-7.html> cnet
>>> <http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9741103-7.html> FCC to require the
>>> merged
>>> companies to pay higher royalty rates in general to the record industry,
>>> arguing the firms are 'no longer new, struggling companies' that can get
>>> away with paying what it called 'below-market rates.'"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> mike
>>>
>>> amature call M0DMD
>>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2