BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Lloyd Rasmussen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 May 2007 10:58:15 -0400
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject:
From:
Christopher Moore <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-disposition:
inline
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
I'm sure the courts can determine the difference between a company name 
and a partial product name without the benefit of a petition.  
73
Chris
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 09:41:08PM -0400, Lloyd Rasmussen wrote:
> According to the text file cited on the petition page, FS is suing Serotek
> for trademark infringement, alleging confusion between the access system
> called "Freedom Box" (one of Serotek's products) and Freedom Scientific.
> 
> Lloyd Rasmussen, W3IUU, Kensington, Maryland
> Home:  http://lras.home.sprynet.com
> Work:  http://www.loc.gov/nls
>  
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > On Behalf Of Ron Canazzi
> > Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 8:44 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: ot Fw: [BCT] Fw: [blind_geek_zone] Freedom Scientific,Inc.
> > Asked to Cease Lawsuit Against Serotek Corporation
> > 
> > Hi List,
> > 
> > As long as this list allows such far flung topics without question, it
> > might
> > be nice if the disseminators of such information would clue us all in
> > about
> > the suit first.  Who or what is Serotek corporation?  Just why is Freedom
> > Scientific suing them?
> > 
> > Thanks for any information.
> >

ATOM RSS1 RSS2