BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Forst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:30:01 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Hi Richard,

Years ago I had a Mosley SWL vertical and found the beefiness of the 
aluminum better than the Cushcraft R5 or Butternut HF 6V I've had since.

Don't know if Mosley uses  the same aircraft grade tubing in the verticals 
as they use in their yagis, but if so, it would be  pretty strong.  To me, 
the Cushcraft aluminum seems lawn chair grade and the Butternut  somewhat 
better.

I looked at the Mosley site, and noticed that some of the verticals are 
referred to as 1/4 wave with optional radials, but the others aren't called 
1/4 wave.  Perhaps these are considered to be  1/2 wave like the Cushcraft's 
and  they can get buy with no real radial system?  Just like the Cushcraft's 
use those little decoupling  stubs at the antenna base.

73, Steve  KW3A





----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 4:09 PM
Subject: mosley verticals


> Hi group;
> Just wondered if anyone had any experience with mosley verticals?  A 
> picture
> is always a thousand words but it didn't sound like there was a 
> counterpoise
> but the also said that radials didn't make any significant difference.  I
> never did find anything on their site that gave me band width info.
> Richard
>
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2