Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 8 Nov 2007 20:50:27 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I love that typo was it on purpose.
At 08:35 PM 11/8/2007, you wrote:
>i know quite a lot of non-religous people, none of
>them are violet.
>
>--- kat <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Are you saying that non-religious people are
> > violent? I don't think you
> > can say that as a generalization. I think it's
> > faulty (and dangerous)
> > to assume that DV would be more likely to happen in
> > one socio-economic
> > (or religious) group than another.
> >
> > I do agree that the demise of the nuclear family and
> > the subsequent lack
> > of a support system has facilitated DV.
> >
> > Kat
> >
> > Linda Walker wrote:
> > > No actually there is quite a bit of DV in higher
> > income homes, even
> > > more covered up. I was responding to the earlier
> > assertion that rural
> > > communities do not have the same problems as urban
> > communities and per
> > > capita I think they do. I am not saying all rural
> > people abuse their
> > > kids but I am saying some do. I am saying it is
> > faulty thinking to
> > > imagine the rural communities as less problematic
> > or even idyllic
> > > because often they have big problems. Moses Lake
> > residents used to
> > > meet the train with baseball bats in hand to stop
> > the African
> > > Americans from debarking. Per capita the murder
> > rate is much higher
> > > than urban areas. Many rural counties are all
> > white for instance. I
> > > think that is a problem in a secular society.
> > >
> > > At 11:01 AM 11/8/2007, you wrote:
> > >> I assume she means that a higher rate of poverty
> > increases the
> > >> likelihood
> > >> of domestic violence=2E It could have been
> > better phrased=2E
> > >>
> > >> Kat
> > >>
> > >> Original Message:
> > >> -----------------
> > >> From: Cleveland, Kyle E=2E
> > keclevel@FRANKLINCOUNTYOHIO=2EGOV
> > >> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 07:56:22 -0500
> > >> To: C-PALSY@LISTSERV=2EICORS=2EORG
> > >> Subject: Re: email was not working on spanking
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Cerebral Palsy List
> > [mailto:C-PALSY@LISTSERV=2EICORS=2EORG] On
> > >> Behal=
> > >> f
> > >> Of Linda Walker
> > >> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 5:45 AM
> > >> To: C-PALSY@LISTSERV=2EICORS=2EORG
> > >> Subject: Re: email was not working on spanking
> > >>
> > >> >--- Linda Walker <lwalker@CHILDPRO=2EORG> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> I guarantee you a lot of
> > >> > > those East
> > >> > > European and Appalachian kids you went to
> > school
> > >> > > with were being
> > >> > > brutalized at home=2E it is simply a well
> > covered up
> > >> > > phenomenon=2E
> > >>
> > >> Where's your empirical evidence of this
> > assertion=2E Seems that you are
> > >> painting an entire community with broad
> > brushstrokes=2E Isn't this
> > >> bigotry=3F
> > >>
> > >> Kyle
> > >>
> >
> > -----------------------
> >
> > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> > list, go here:
> >
> >
>http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> >
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>-----------------------
>
>To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
>http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
-----------------------
To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
|
|
|