and to add insult to injory, it even had a setup for the accompanying
linnier amplifier whereby enough current was delivered out the PA
speaker jack to keep the relays open so people wouldn't know our man was
running a power amplifier. he had it set up just nicely. the only thing
you knew was when he was running at full power. 350 watts through a
virtically polarised 4 element yagi directed straight at you, tends to
make you sit up and think.
anyways, we digress.
Shaun
web sites:
http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
skype: brailledude
On 21/03/2008 1:25 AM, the old scribe known as Shaun Oliver was able to
impart this pearl of wisdom:
> me thinks we'll have to agree to disagree. best ever audio I heard aside
> from an amateur radio what wasn't driven to buggery by a 10 4 good buddy
> chicken band operator, was a turner super sidekick driving a ferris 5500
> bass station.
> if you didn't know any better, you'd swear it was an amateur radio, it
> sounded that nice.
>
> Shaun
> web sites:
> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
> skype: brailledude
>
>
> On 21/03/2008 12:58 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>> Nope, mine is the original turner plus 3 which is the best sounding one of
>> the series. Eats batteries, but sounds good while doing it.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:54 AM
>> Subject: Re: a curley question about valve transceivers.
>>
>>
>>> hmmm. is yours the plus 3b?
>>> ah. yes I remember now. the hand mics were the road king and the m plus
>>> 3. I use to own an m plus 3. the desk mics were the plus 3b and the
>>> super side kick. I always loved the audio of the super side kick.
>>>
>>> Shaun
>>> web sites:
>>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>>> skype: brailledude
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/03/2008 12:49 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
>>> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>>>> that's not a hand mic, it's a desk mic.
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:42 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: a curley question about valve transceivers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> hmmm. a turner plus 3 hand mic on a kenwood 120s.
>>>>> that would be a rather ballsy sound.
>>>>> I had a friend back in my chocolate box days, had one of those on a
>>>>> yaesu ft101e and that thing had balls. don't think he ever got his ham
>>>>> license but god that radio use to sound nice..
>>>>> he would use a little bit of processor along with just enough gain on
>>>>> the mic itself to get that grunt I'm just about salivating over. and
>>>>> you'd know when he keyed up too because he had this destinctive clunk.
>>>>>
>>>>> Shaun
>>>>> web sites:
>>>>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>>>>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>>>>> skype: brailledude
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21/03/2008 12:36 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
>>>>> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>>>>>> I just got my TS-120 on the air, I'll use it to talk to the locals on
>>>>>> 10
>>>>>> meters at night for a while to make sure everything's as it should be,
>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>> very happy with it so far though with the turner plus 3 mic on it. I
>>>>>> get
>>>>>> great reports so far.
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:27 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: a curley question about valve transceivers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> reason I asked is because I'm looking at a yaesu ft201 on saturday and
>>>>>>> am curious to see if the same principal applies.
>>>>>>> I'd hold out for a kenwood 120v or even a 120s or something of that
>>>>>>> era,
>>>>>>> hell, even a yaesu ft7, but, there doesn't seem to be too many of them
>>>>>>> wanting to be sold. hi hi.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Shaun
>>>>>>> web sites:
>>>>>>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>>>>>>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>>>>>>> skype: brailledude
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 21/03/2008 12:05 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>>>>>>>> That's true with *some* of them. I think the TS-520 you can do that,
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> some others I know but I know not all.
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 4:24 AM
>>>>>>>> Subject: a curley question about valve transceivers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi, I've heard it said that if one removes one of the finals from an
>>>>>>>>> amateur transceiver, one is able to cut the maximum output power
>>>>>>>>> down
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> aprox 30 watts pep. firstly, is this correct?
>>>>>>>>> and if it is, does it matter which final you remove, and secondly,
>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>> it's not correct, which I highly suspect is the case, would it just
>>>>>>>>> render the transceiver inoperable until the valve was replaced?
>>>>>>>>> thanks in advance.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Shaun
>>>>>>>>> web sites:
>>>>>>>>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>>>>>>>>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>>>>>>>>> skype: brailledude
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>>>>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>>>>
>>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>>
>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
|
