BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:18:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Not many can afford those high end radios like the 7800 or the 950SDX in 
it's late years, they have radios for the markets that sell. Me personally, 
I'll never live to see the day I can afford a top of the line radio and most 
of the hams I know will say the same thing. It's probably not a big deal not 
to have a $5000 or $10000 radio. Very likely, I'll stick with Kenwood for a 
while yet with icom being my second choice, if Kenwood leaves, I'll go to 
icom. I've heard that rumor so long though, I'll believe it if I ever see 
it. They have a ton of loyal customers, I still know more people that use 
mostly kenwoods, and work far more kenwoods than anything else on the 
market.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Keith Barrett" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: Kenwood and ham radio


> Interesting,
>
> Notice that the announcement from Kenwood did not seem to be promising
> any new hf gear.
>
> I suppose they can stay in the land mobile market and offer firmware for
> amateur transceivers without too much expense.
>
> However, their current hf offerings are rather hopeless compared to the
> competition and one wonders whether they will have any loyal customers
> left.
>
> I got fed up of waiting for a viable replacement to my 950sdx so got 
> myself
> an ic7800.
>
> I think they will have a hard job winning back those who got the pro 3 and
> various ft1000/2000 series.
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2