Hey Chris how much are you charging Phil for that bit of advice? lol just
kidding.
Lelia
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Gilland" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: Please Check
> phil: Found the problem!
>
>
> You have a </LI> tag at the end of your unordered list. Why did you do
> that?
>
> That is probably the problem. When you're doing a bulleted unordered
list,
> you don't have to end the list. the <LI> (list tag) is not a switch tag.
> It's only a 1 way. in other words here is the correct syntax:
>
>
> <P>here is a bulleted list</P>
> <P><UL>
> <LI>This is the first bullet.
> <LI>This is the second bullet.
> <LI>This is the third.
> <LI>And so on.
> </UL></P>
>
> See? You don't end with a less slash l i. That isn't proper HTML. Trust
> me: I am a web designer for a company and being paid for it too... I
> should know.
>
>
> So, try taking out that slash l i tag, and let me know then, if she can
see
> it... Your html looks flawless other than this, and if you are doing this
> in notepad straight from scratch, then, wait! ago! You! are doing
> commendable!
>
>
> HTML's a hard thing to learn! It's not, but yet, it is. Don't let it
> discourage ya bro: Take it one step at a time. You have my e-mail, and
my
> number both... Keep in mind, that I do this as a job, so thus i'm not
gonna
> be available always, but where I can, I'll be happy to work with you on
it,
> if you'd like... just don't talk to me about java script! LOL! That's!
> where I draw the line. Heheheheh.
>
> i usually just find a script for what I need, then copy, paste, and modify
> it accordingly.
>
> Anyway, I sincerely hope that this helps. Your link did show up for me,
but
> that doesn't mean that the html is right necessarily. That's one thing
> about html, vs. programming in a whole that makes html real hard: You can
> get what are known as syntaxtual errors, yes, which are very similar to
> programming in that the code is not written correctly. Where it differs
> greatly, however, is that it's kind a like taking a syntaxtual error and a
> symantic error and combining them. Um: by this, I basicly mean, let's
take
> your example here with that l i tag. The link red just fine, for me, and
> probbly would even have worked had I went to it... so, it isn't like it's
> producing falt in the page, it's just that the code isn't written properly
> which in term, could! in rare cases: cause undesirable results, maybe not
> for everyone but for some depending, A: on how their browser is
configured,
> B: if there browser supports what you are trying to accomplish, or even
C:
> if for that matter: there opporating system supports it... A good
example
> of the most latter is Java script under the text terminal console of
Linux.
> Or really unix in a whole: if a person is using either linx: L, Y, n, x:
> or Links: L, i! n, k, s: then java script will not work. i think
Mozilla
> will do it in the gnome desktop environment but that's off topic and we're
> not discussing java script to begin with so, i'll leave that to your
> thinkings. LOL!
>
>
> Take care:
>
>
> Love you in Christ.
>
>
> Chris.
>
|