[log in to unmask] wrote:
>
> In comparison we have the same problems today; a hurricane takes
> out a dryvit mall and the people bemoan that millions are lost
> . Yet they will replace it with another dryvit mall whose life may
> only be 15 years anyway
>
> I am still not convinced that quick-obsolete buildings are not
> economically more sound than building for permanence, and then having
> to toss the whole thing out. But then Sempronius was a friend of mine.
c,
It depends on to what degree the environment is considered in the
economic equation. Then again, Sempronius is know to spend a lot of time
at Summerhill soaking up the rays. Last anyone should desire is for him
to hang out at a coffee house on DFI where I assume that you made his
acquaintance last.
][<
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>