Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:12:02 -0600 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
yeah, i doubt that
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Colin McDonald wrote:
> yeh its a bit over the top.
> although good for people who have absolutely no way to use amateur radio,
> since the people on qso net are indeed amateur operators, or supposedly they
> all are.
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 2:43 PM
> Subject: qsonet
>
>
>> Hi;
>> Now I have seen everything. I guess I'm showing my age. Make believe ham
>> radio for only $32.00?
>> I suppose the no antenna required could have some appeal but why bother
>> pretend radio. If one wants a chat room go find one. Who knows, in 50
>> years folks might think that this is what ham radio was like back in the
>> "good old days".
>> I didn't have as much of a issue with echo link in that it was free but
> real
>> live ham radio it wasn't. It did serve a limited purpose but I don't
> think
>> it tried to pass its self off as something as much fun as the real thing.
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.12/631 - Release Date: 1/16/2007
> 8:25 AM
>>
>>
>
|
|
|