Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:49:26 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Vostre opiniones es multo importante pro me
JL
2013/1/13 Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>
> Ego pote comprender le [w] in [perswa'der], presente [per'swade], quia le
> verbo ha 3 syllabas per-sua-der, per-sua-de, ma "superflue" ha 4 syllabas e
> isto motiva [su'perflue]. Forsan suffice que on dona "perswader
> [-swa'der]", "persuade [-'swade].
>
> Quanto al "innate" ego non es certe, ma il me sembla, quando ego lo
> pronuncia, que ego usa un curte n, non [n:].
>
> Kjell R
>
>
>
> 2013/1/13 Josu Lavin <[log in to unmask]>
>
> > Io habeva oblidate iste paragrapho que ha relation con lo commenate per
> > Bent:
> > §6
> >
> > DOUBLE CONSONANTS merge in pronunciation. The double consonant *ss* is
> > always voiceless like *ss* in 'miss.' The sounds of *g* and *k*
> assimilate
> > a preceding *n* as in English. Note that the double consonant *cc* is
> > spelled *c* at the end of a word (*siccar* but *sic*).
> > Io non complicarea le cosas e io scriberea [anglese], per exemplo.
> >
> > Un altere question:
> >
> > Esque vos pronuncia [innate] o [inate] le parola INNATE?
> >
> > [grammátika] o [gramátika]
> >
> > Io usa ( e io va conrinuar a usar) gram-matica, in-nate, il-le, ad-er,
> etc.
> >
> > In le transcriptiones in vice de KA KE KI KO KU io usarea CA CHE CHI CO
> CU.
> >
> > Illo non serea IPA, ma que importa? O si?
> >
> > Amicalmente
> >
> > Josu Lavin
> >
> >
> > --
> > Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
> > http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html
> >
>
>
> --
> Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
> http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html
>
--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html
|
|
|