Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 5 May 2007 00:30:21 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Nothing wrong with yeasu warm tone and excellent tx whats wrong with you
people as for kenwood I wouldt touch one if they paid me a million pounds
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of John Miller
Sent: 04 May 2007 21:20
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: multiband fm
There are no mobiles right now that have 6, 2, and 440. Avoid alinco,
they're absolute garbage in their quality, for the most part. I use one at
the state EOC and the thing is like playing with a toy after using my
kenwood equipment. for 2 and 440, Kenwood has the most accessible radios by
far. If you want to buy the software too to program it, icom isn't too bad.
Far as I know, there is no 2, 6, and 440 mobile out there at all right now
other than 1 yaesu that has 10 in it as well and I see a ton of them on the
used market because people can't stand them. Being yaesu, I can't blame
them.
----- Original Message -----
From: "matt V" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 4:08 PM
Subject: multiband fm
> hi all,
> I have been eyeing mobile dual and triband radios but it seems to me =
> what kenwood had for 2/440 and 2/440/6 are quickly fading away, on =
> hamradio.com at least. are the alinko and/or icom radios workable and =
> if so, which ones, and preferably one that won't self distruct <smile>
> I guess i am curious to work 6m and or 440 being i never have so I don't =
> even know if protocol on those bands are different than 2m or not
>
> http://www.mypowermall.com/biz/home/3833
|
|
|