BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Fiorello <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:51:57 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
Hi Steve;
Thanks for the info. I will certainly keep it in mind.  Its much easier to 
do it right the first time.
Richard
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Forst" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 10:06 PM
Subject: Re: coax


Richard,

Look for coax called "direct bury", which means it can be put  right in the
ground without conduit or pipe.  More expensive, but nobody said it's a
cheap hobby.  Although it's not buried, I use "Bury-Flex" by Davis RF.  Low
loss, rugged, and  direct buriable.

There are other remote tuners besides MFJ.  I think  some of the LDG tuners
are used in this fashion.   Of course you will need to provide a
weather-proof enclosure.  You will no doubt need one that can withstand 11
feet of snow on top of it.

73, Steve KW3A
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 9:34 PM
Subject: coax


> Hi;
> Its still very early but I am looking at possibly trying to ground mount a
> vertical.  When and if the snow melts I have to do some measuring.  I did
> this at another qth about 30 years ago.  As I recall we just berried the
> coax.  Any suggestions as to the best cable to avoid water damage and not
> have to dig it up in six months?
> Also, apparently mfj markets some type of remote tuner to be used at the
> antenna.  I don't have the model number but I wonder if anyone knows much
> about it or has tried it?  It was suggested by some people at force12 as
> something that could be used as a substitute for their remote matching
> system.
> Richard
>
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2