Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:11:47 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Butch,
I have to disagree with your statement about signal strength. I have a
receptor digital radio here and I've been able to receive several noisy fm
stations digitally with no noise. Now the normal analog signal has to be
nearly full quieting to get a solid digital signal, but the difference
between the two signals is amazing. On A M, the analog signal has to be
pretty strong, but again once the radio switches over to digital reception,
the fidelity improves and the A M background hiss goes away. Now, the only
thing that we need is better programming!
73
Bob, [log in to unmask], K8LR
Skype Name: bobtinn
Live Long and Prosper!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2007 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [NYDXA-List] FCC Approves IBOC Go Ahead
Well, digital fm isn't all that great either as far as signal strength
required. I was at the a e s store yesterday, and they had some good
music playing. We got to talking, and they told me clear channel had
asked if they could set up a demmo of an h d radio. They told me they had
to string out quite a bit of wire for an antenna just to get a good enough
signal.
73s
Butch Bussen
wa0vjr
|
|
|