BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brett Winches <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:46:53 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
Not to mention the unreliability factor.  Take a look at Thailand I
think, with 90% of their main backbone affected  by undersea  cable cuts
breaks.  

 

-----

BRETT WINCHESTER

[log in to unmask] 

208-639-8386

###

 

 


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Richard Fiorello
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 2:43 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: qsonet

Hi;
Now I have seen everything.  I guess I'm showing my age.  Make believe
ham 
radio for only $32.00?
I suppose the no antenna required could have some appeal but why bother 
pretend radio.  If one wants a chat room go find one.  Who knows, in 50 
years folks might think that this is what ham radio was like back in the

"good old days".
I didn't have as much of a issue with echo link in that it was free but
real 
live ham radio it wasn't.  It did serve a limited purpose but I don't
think 
it tried to pass its self off as something as much fun as the real
thing.
Richard

ATOM RSS1 RSS2