Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:24:23 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Traditional Eskimo diet would have had adequate sodium and chloride for
nutritional needs, possibly because there was less loss of blood than in
our commercial system.
Also I note that completely raw meat does not need salt, to my taste.
And yes, on raw meat it is overpowering. Maybe the kind of salt in
blood/meat is destroyed in terms of bio-availability by cooking?
William
Marilyn Harris wrote:
> I don't know - I imagine their diet would be low-sodium but perhaps at
> adequate levels for the type of diet so there are no cravings. They
> may simply abhor the taste - which tends to be overpowering...
>
> Marilyn
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ashley Moran" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 7:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Newbie Question - Organ Meats
>
>
>> On Jul 25, 2008, at 3:42 pm, Marilyn Harris wrote:
>>
>>> A little on Stefansson - I like what they say about salt - that the
>>> Eskimo do not eat salt at all and do not even like it.
>>
>> Is that because their food is naturally saltier? I imagine if you
>> diet is more land-based and with more veg (and therefore with a
>> higher potassium-sodium ratio) that you'd naturally crave more salt.
>>
>> Or maybe there's another explanation?
>>
>> Ashley
>>
>
>
|
|
|