Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 14 May 2008 19:02:34 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
You know I hear all the time from people that meat doesn't have flavor, that it's the fat. And I agree to the extent that I love a good tasting animal fat - for me: buffalo for example. But it is not true that lean meat doesn't taste good. At least it's not true for me. I think that I am a glutamate freak. I love the taste of meat, lean, fat or somewhere in-between. I don't like the taste of pork fat on beef. Why people think they have to wrap a filet in bacon is beyond me. I love the flavor of a filet. And yes it does have flavor - to me. Yes a fattier venison is better tasting - but even lean venison (or elk or any of the red meat variety that I love so much) tastes good to me.
gale
----- Original Message ----
From: william <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 8:57:32 PM
Subject: Re: Stone-age diet may lower risk of heart disease
Gale wrote:
> It seems to me that people (now or then) regardless of situation would try to eat just about everything. What wouldn't we put in our mouths and eat? I think the standards for what might have constituted a "normal" paleolithic diet would have to include - whatever you could find.
>
Sense of taste varies according to culture in our time, that means that
it is software-driven, call it programmable.
We assume that paleolithic man didn't suffer from the
programming/advertising/preaching that we get, so would have had a very
different idea of what tastes good/is edible
For instance, lean meat does not taste as good as fat meat, unless you
believe. Faith can move mountains.
William
|
|
|