Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:32:01 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
70 million a month in US alone not bad in my opionion
mike
amature call M0DMD
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of John Miller
Sent: 12 July 2007 17:16
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: OT now they are moving on to satelite radio
Personally, I don't care what happens with "internet radio" which is not
radio. Most of that is little setups people setup on their computers at home
and get almost no listeners anyway so they could just as easy go underground
and have no more problems. Why anyone would admit to owning rights to music
put out these days is beyond me too but that's another story lol.
----- Original Message -----
From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: OT now they are moving on to satelite radio
> Yeah but as congress may make internet radio the same as satalite radio
> then
> they want to put that up so internet pays more.
>
> mike
> amature call M0DMD
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of John Miller
> Sent: 12 July 2007 15:50
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: OT now they are moving on to satelite radio
>
> They tried this one before a couple times and got nowhere with it.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 10:42 AM
> Subject: Re: OT now they are moving on to satelite radio
>
>
>> It's all greed!
>>
>> SUSAN & ANTHONY VECE
>> 20 N. LOGAN AVE.
>> AUDUBON, NJ. 08106-1037
>> HOME PHONE: (856) 310-8323
>> SUSAN'S CELL: (609) 471-2955
>> ANTHONY'S CELL: (609) 471-2662
>> AOL SCREEN NAME: AJV48
>> SKYPE USER NAME: AJV624
>> AMATEUR RADIO CALLSIGN: W2AJV
>> [log in to unmask]
>> ECHOLINK NODE: 74389
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 5:19 AM
>> Subject: OT now they are moving on to satelite radio
>>
>>
>>> Although Cnet news is credited with this It actually comes from the
>>> Radio
>>> and internet news letter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From CNET News: "The RIAA has already mounted a court challenge against
>>> <http://www.xmradio.com> XM Satellite Radio over gadgets like the
>>> Pioneer
>>> Inno that allow <http://www.riaa.com> <http://www.riaa.com/> riaa
>>> <http://www.riaa.com> consumers to trap individual songs originally
>>> played
>>> on air in alleged violation of copyright.
>>>
>>> "Now the industry group is urging that issue to be one of the deciding
>>> factors xm/sirius?for federal regulators weighing the proposed
>>> multibillion-dollar union of XM and its sole competitor, Sirius
>>> Satellite
>>> radio...
>>>
>>> "[T]he RIAA said it's concerned that both satellite radio companies have
>>> invested in technologies that allow them to shortchange artists on the
>>> distribution side 'by giving users the ability to download copyrighted
>>> sound
>>> recordings to portable devices, effectively transforming a radio-like
>>> service into a digital distribution subscription service like Rhapsody
>>> or
>>> Napster.'
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> A merger could bolster those investments and 'seriously threaten the
>>> viability of the music industry as a whole,' the RIAA wrote. The group
>>> also
>>> called on the <http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9741103-7.html>
>>> <http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9741103-7.html> cnet
>>> <http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9741103-7.html> FCC to require the
>>> merged
>>> companies to pay higher royalty rates in general to the record industry,
>>> arguing the firms are 'no longer new, struggling companies' that can get
>>> away with paying what it called 'below-market rates.'"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> mike
>>>
>>> amature call M0DMD
>>>
|
|
|