BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:05:02 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
From Radio and internet newsletter

The letter reads, "We believe when Congress takes a hard look behind this
curtain of misinformation being fostered by SaveNetRadio, their campaign for
BigNetRadio will be fully revealed for what it is: a cash grab by
BigNetRadio." 

Citing "facts" to support this portrayal of royalty relief efforts as a
"cash grab," SoundExchange claims, "14 of the 20 largest webcasters, some
who comprise  <http://www.digmedia.org> DiMA and SaveNetRadio, have market
capitalization ranging from one billion to several hundred billion dollars,"
and "The other large webcasters have significant venture capital backing."
Naturally, SoundExchange fails to mention the names of these 14
multi-billion-dollar public companies, or what it considers "significant
venture capital backing"  <http://www.riaa.org>  <http://www.riaa.org/>
<http://www.riaa.org> for the other six operations. 

SoundExchange does cite CBS' recent $280 million acquisition of
<http://www.dima.org> Last.fm, and bemoans the fact that "none of (this
money) went to artists or copyright holders" (read: labels). What isn't
explained is why "vendors" would expect to receive a share of proceeds from
the sale of "a customer" (or the fact that artists receive no share of the
enormous sale prices of major label groups as they consolidate).

 

mike

amature call M0DMD

 

 

 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2