I know some one who did test that. It didn't live up to anywhere near the
advertising, his friend, who tested that by mistake with his swimming pool,
it did survive though.
----- Original Message -----
From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: ht question
> Bud they are submersible still on ham bands and are ham radios just
> waterproof though I wouldn't want to test them HI
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
> Sent: 15 April 2007 23:06
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: ht question
>
> Check out the web site. They're rated at 30 minutes submerged at three
> feet
> for
> use in marine environments. Do I need to supply you with a link or can
> you
> find
> the Yaesu page on your own?
>
>
> Tom Brennan KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
>
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, mike wrote:
>
>> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 20:07:19 +0100
>> From: mike <[log in to unmask]>
>> Reply-To: For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: ht question
>>
>> How dare you call the Yaesu rigs marine what have been smoking? and can
>> I
>> ask for your dealer?
>> The rigs Gena was on about are Amateur I use same rigs myself M0DMD
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
>> Sent: 15 April 2007 19:45
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: ht question
>>
>> Those radios really don't apply to0 this situation. You're talking about
>> using
>> those marine rigs and I'm talking about using the vx2 which is a
> completely
>> different ball of wax.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> Tom Brennan KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
>> web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
>>
>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Georgina Joyce wrote:
>>
>> > Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:08:40 +0100
>> > From: Georgina Joyce <[log in to unmask]>
>> > To: [log in to unmask]
>> > Subject: Re: ht question
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > Well that's your problem and prejudice. I frequently used my VX7 and
>> > now my VX6 I also used a 817 with a PC. I agree that they could be
>> > more
>> > accessible but they are not. It doesn't mean that it is a bad radio.
>> > Everyone likes the warm sound of Yaesu radios and I like the feel and
>> > design. To each of his own.
>> >
>> > 73
>> >
>> > Gena
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: For blind ham radio operators
>> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Miller
>> > Sent: 15 April 2007 16:41
>> > To: [log in to unmask]
>> > Subject: Re: ht question
>> >
>> >
>> > If it's like the VX1R with only like 6 buttons and a dial on the hole
>> > thing,
>> > you won't get very far with it. Programming with the software and not
>> > able
>> > to change anything yourself. Personally, I'd stay away from yaesu at
>> > all
>> >
>> > cost, and I do.
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: <[log in to unmask]>
>> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> > Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 11:26 AM
>> > Subject: ht question
>> >
>> >
>> > > Has anyone on the list used the Yaesu vh2 ht? Its supposed to be the
>> > > smallest
>> > > dual bander available. Its just over four ounces. My wife has taken
>> > a
>> > > shine to
>> > > it but I'm concerned with being to operate it as tuning is via a dial
>> > and
>> > > I'm
>> > > wondering about accessing things because of that.
>> > >
>> > > Tom
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Tom Brennan KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
>> > > web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
>> >
>> > __________ NOD32 2190 (20070415) Information __________
>> >
>> > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com
>> >
>>
|
