Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 7 Jan 2007 15:45:13 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Anthony,
You are making a broad-brush statement here ... "it is light years ahead of any
program".
In what respects? Most reviews appear to show that there are comparable
features. In the default mode, Kurzweil may outperform OpenBook. But, the
differences in head-to-head scans are not that great. The Kurzweil does have a
confidence level indication which is nice. One interesting note is that
OpenBook used to be better at converting a PDF image into text.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: it does it again.
Hi Mark;
K1000 is Kurzweil 1000.
It's a scanning and reading program.
I had OpenBook and I traded it in for K1000 and it is light years ahead of
anything else out there.
73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
----- Original Message -----
From: "Frederick" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] it does it again.
> Hi
>
> What is this K 1000 program that you read the PDF file with? I have run in
> to a few of those blank documents myself. If there is a way to read them I
> would love to know about it.
> Thank you!
> God bless,
> Mark
> God loves you!
> My ham radio lists.
> http://lists.topica.com/lists/funhamradio.
> http://groups.google.com/group/funhamradio-list
> My personal website
> http://funhamradio.bloki.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 8:47 AM
> Subject: it does it again.
>
>
>> I was sent a copy of a technical article last night that was a pdf
>> file. I tried to open it in accrobat, but was told the files was
>> empty. This was because the entire article was graphical. I just
>> read it using k1000. Not perfect, but now I know a lot more about
>> how to build a windom antenna than I did before. Thinking of trying
>> it this spring.
>>
>>
>
|
|
|