BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Lou Kline <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:40:32 -0500
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (134 lines)
Hi.

I've noticed that people generally only support free speech when it is 
their speech.
--Lou, K2LKK

At 08:48 PM 3/10/2007 +0000, you wrote:
>If people want to talk for weeks on a subject Damn well let em!!!!!!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>On Behalf Of Colin McDonald
>Sent: 10 March 2007 20:38
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: mfj analyzer
>
>I know I'm a God, at least, that's what my wife is always calling me.
>
>I'll defend my position and then let it go.
>This topic went on for some days with multiple posts coming to the list and
>I believe several various subject lines as well.
>Tom was even good enough to take the time to post the links on the list to
>the article and MP3 file explaining the device before he left due to, er,
>extrainious posts on the list.
>The whole purpose of an email list such as this is to share information and
>to insure that people understand that information and have access to it.
>I just found it a bit strange that a topic relating to a device that has
>been sought after for years by blind hams, and that could potentially
>greatly assist us in the building and tuning of antenna systems was totally
>missed by a few individuals.
>Why are they here if they don't pay attention to the very information that
>this list was set up to give them acces to?
>Just my opinions, and it's not necesary to extend this thread by much more.
>73
>Colin, V A6BKX
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Lou Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 11:41 AM
>Subject: Re: mfj analyzer
>
>
> > Colin:
> >
> > I disagree.  There is a lot of extraneous stuff that goes through and if
> > you don't check it daily, it mounts up rather quickly.  I think you and
>the
> > other list gods need to do a little less lecturing.  That would cut down
>on
> > the rest of us using the delete key so much.  Frankly, there are some
> > people that go back and forth all day and night, and some of them I hit
>the
> > delete key as soon as I see their name or even have a filter do it for me.
> >
> > 73, de Lou K2LKK
> >
> > At 10:42 PM 3/7/2007 -0700, you wrote:
> > >Tom Fowle, the other gentleman involved in the Mcount and MFJ209 project
>was
> > >on this list and posted many times.
> > >Including a link to the articles before they were availible to the
>public.
> > >There was also a link posted to an MP3 file explaining the use and
>function
> > >of the Mcount with the analyzer.
> > >The people who have asked the questions regarding this project were most
> > >certainly subscribed to the list throughout these exchanges.
> > >Barring memory loss, i think perhaps some should pay a little more
>attention
> > >to the traffic on the list.
> > >There really isn't that much, and its usually very informative.
> > >Just think, there might be all kinds of information that you have missed
> > >because you were too quick with the delete key.
> > >73
> > >Colin, V A6BKX
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Pat Gormley" <[log in to unmask]>
> > >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > >Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 6:31 PM
> > >Subject: mfj analyzer
> > >
> > >
> > > > There was an item which I'm about to read which appeared in February
>QST =
> > > > regarding the MFJ 209 analyzer.  Stay tuned and I'll tell you as I =
> > > > gather more information.  73- pat kk3f
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.7/713 - Release Date:
>3/7/2007
> > >9:24 AM
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > >Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/717 - Release Date: 3/10/2007
> > >2:25 PM
> >
> > Louis Kim Kline
> > A.R.S. K2LKK
> > Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> > Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> > Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/716 - Release Date: 3/9/2007
>6:53 PM
> >
> >
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/717 - Release Date: 3/10/2007 
>2:25 PM

Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2