 
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Sender: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:07:21 -0600 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
You are in most cases correct. The operators of repeaters that really
care about what their repeater sounds like does a good job. And there are
more and more that are
cleaning up the audio and getting ID's off of the system. Or at least the
ones that are connecting to me are doing better. ----- Original
Message -----
From: "Buddy Brannan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: qsonet
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 04:10:17PM -0600, Bob - KA5ETA wrote:
> Echolink is not the real thing for sure. But I will tell you that
> echolink
> is the best repeater linking tool that has been around in many years.
Ahem. Second-best. IRLP is more reliable, running under GNU/Linux by
default, with very tight technical standards to help ensure both
security and good sound without too many unnecessary things (ID's,
hang timers, pulsebacks) bleeding through. Echolink has no such peer
regulation.
|
|
|
