ECHURCH-USA Archives

The Electronic Church

ECHURCH-USA@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
MariJean <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Electronic Church <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:58:08 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Hi there Vinny,

I disagree with the importance of these things.  The early "church" 
made every attempt to separate itself from things Jewish, including 
but not limitted to the Sabbath, Passover, the importance upon which 
day the Crucifiction took place.  Talk about herasies!

LOVE IN HIM,

purple Mari



At 10:03 AM 4/6/2007, you wrote:
>I  have often wondered why the historic church ever came up with the 
>idea Jesus  was crucified on Friday and raised on Sunday.
>Didn't  Jesus say that as Jonah was three days and nights in the 
>earth, (my paraphrase) so the son of man should be three days hand nights.
>I can't find the exact scripture.  But if  that were so, Jesus would 
>have to had to have died Wednesday or Thursday.  This is not really 
>important, but it is  interesting to see where the traditional 
>church got that from.
>Vinny

ATOM RSS1 RSS2