Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:35:34 -1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 04:01 PM 8/20/2001 -0500, Automatic digest processor wrote:
>Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 09:40:15 -0400
>From: Liza May <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: Enter the ZONE?
>
>Hi Prema,
>Quick answer (no time...):
>Zone is pretty good about percentages, makes some sense as temporary aid
>to help people recover from sugar addiction, etc. But not necessary or
>sensible for long term.
Greetings!
Whenever somebody has time, I would like to know why balancing eicosanoids
to harmonize the hormones is NOT a sensible long term alternative. Is it
the consumption of large amounts of protein and small amounts of carbohydrates?
>And not concerned with quality of foods eaten -
I agree. I tried the Atkins diet, a couple of years ago. It was way too
much flesh for me, even then. I became a Vegetarian this past February. I
like fish and I feel safe with the fish caught off the shores of the
Hawaiian island, where I reside. But I was becoming worried about the
quality of the chicken and meats.
Plus, I never seemed to digest meat well. Vegetarianism has been much
kinder to my colon, I think.
>this diet is more about percentages of macronutrients.
>Soy - not great. Lots to be said on this, lots of studies done, lots for
>you to read. Soy seems worrisome.
I'd like to know the problems with Soy products.
>Sorry for brevity of message - welcome to raw food group.
>Love Liza
Thank you, VERY much, for the time that you took to reply.
forward!
trust, prema
|
|
|