Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:21:29 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I think 7.0 is 1 of the best versions made but 6.2 wasn't too bad either.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: Off Topic - Jaws 7.1 Memory requirements
> No fooling! I think I figured that out quite a while ago. Lots of
> sarcasm
> intended!
>
> I use it at work, and I was unimpressed enough with it there that I will
> not spend personal money on it at home. That is why I am taking a wait
> and
> see posture with it before spending any more money on it. I've got one
> foot out the door.
>
> 73.
> --Lou K2LKK
>
>
>
> At 06:54 PM 10/28/2006 -0400, you wrote:
>>That won't work. You must be authorized to run 7.0 and 7.10 and if you
>>didn't keep up your SMA, you aren't authorized if it expired with 6.20.
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
>>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 5:52 PM
>>Subject: Re: Off Topic - Jaws 7.1 Memory requirements
>>
>>
>>So, just download it off Freedom Scientific's web site. They archive all
>>the previous versions up there. Even if you have a slow internet
>>connection, it only takes a few minutes for a friend with high speed to
>>download it and dump it to a CD-RW.
>>
>>--Lou K2LKK
>
> Louis Kim Kline
> A.R.S. K2LKK
> Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> Work Telephone: (585) 697-5753
>
|
|
|