in that case I am not going to join
don't want to loose my license.
I just got my license in june of 2006 and don't care to loose it.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: Taking the radio out of ham radio


> because that has nothing to do with ham radio what so ever and in fact 
> helps
> go against ham radio because of the way it's promoted. It should be 100%
> illegal for an internet chat room, to "require" a ham radio license and 
> the
> insinuation that they are anything to do with ham radio puts them over the
> line, in my book, of fraud. Anyone who'd support such a thing obviously
> doesn't care at all about ham radio and what it's all about and shouldn't
> have a license, especially for those incredibly shameful lazy hams that 
> will
> actually use that in place of HF privileges, and potentially the work to 
> get
> a license to go on HF because the fact remains, it's nothing more than an
> internet chat room that fraudulently claims to be ham radio, simulated or
> not.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "hank smith" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 1:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Taking the radio out of ham radio
>
>
>> why should they loose there license?
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 9:12 AM
>> Subject: Re: Taking the radio out of ham radio
>>
>>
>>> but this idiot that invented this doesn't have any RF involved at all so
>>> it's not radio in the least and anyone who thinks it is needs to look at
>>> what radio is. Personally, I think anyone who would sign up or anything
>>> with
>>> them should lose their license but that's JMO.
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Christopher Moore" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:38 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Taking the radio out of ham radio
>>>
>>>
>>>> Buddy,
>>>> Since you signed up for the 90 day free trial, give us a report on how
>>>> it work and whether the transceiver software is accessible.  They said
>>>> there were some shortcut keys to help the visually impaired.
>>>>
>>>> The one nice thing about this product is you don't need to mess around
>>>> with your router ports as you do with echolink.  you can also make 
>>>> qso's
>>>> with cw.
>>>>
>>>> I think the purists might argue that anything that use voip is NOT ham
>>>> radio.
>>>>
>>>> 73 Chris w1gm
>>>>
>>>
>>
>