BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
hank smith <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:12:33 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
I have been considdering joining but don't want to get my license revoaked 
sense I don't fall under those bands that are listed
otherwise I would do it
any people with tech licenses joined yet?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christopher Moore" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: Taking the radio out of ham radio


> Buddy,
> Since you signed up for the 90 day free trial, give us a report on how
> it work and whether the transceiver software is accessible.  They said
> there were some shortcut keys to help the visually impaired.
>
> The one nice thing about this product is you don't need to mess around
> with your router ports as you do with echolink.  you can also make qso's
> with cw.
>
> I think the purists might argue that anything that use voip is NOT ham
> radio.
>
> 73 Chris w1gm
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2