Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:00:25 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Robert:
Actually, that was my main point. Paleo already puts you aside from many
others; all-raw leads you into oblivion. I'm saying this lato sensu [in
broad terms] of course. By the way, ancient Romans had this saying: Vae
soli, which means "Woe to him that is alone".
It's also well worth mentioning that in primitives or small communities,
individuals hardly have their own choices as far as food and diet are
concerned. As a rule, they will all eat uniformly. If they deviate, they
can suffer from discrimination, much harder than in our present society.
At least in our society, you can eat as you please. There may be some
discrimination against you if you choose a quite different path, but it's
often veiled and you can always find ways to mask your different ways.
After all, we must be thankful for the allowances our society confers on
us.
Regards,
José Carlos
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:36:08 -0600, Robert Kesterson <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
<snip>
>I am not at all opposed to raw foods, but I do think the social aspect is
>worth mentioning. It's hard enough just being paleo. Add raw paleo on
>top of that, and it's going to be really difficult.
>
>--
> Robert Kesterson
> [log in to unmask]
>=========================================================================
|
|
|