BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 17 Dec 2006 12:27:06 -0600
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (109 lines)
I suppose all this is depending upon your definition of "constructive change".

Tom


Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html

On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Steve wrote:

> Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 12:31:10 -0500
> From: Steve <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Fw: [WestMichiganHams] FCC Eliminates Morse Code Requirement
>     (Finally!!)
> 
> Tom,
> 
> I have to disagree a bit.  I'm not in favor of dumbing down the hobby.  But, I 
> think a lot of hams look askance when they refer to some of the newcomers to the 
> hobby.
> 
> I hate to think of the operating skills I have now, whatever they are, compared 
> to what I had as a Novice.  Had it not been for a couple of elmers, I don't 
> think they would have improved as much.
> 
> I think if we are open to taking a new ham under our wing, so to speak, we can 
> elevate their skills and preserve the ham radio tradition.  But, if we refuse to 
> accept them, and we refuse to accept constructive change, the hobby will surely 
> die.  I love CW, it's still probably my favorite mode, but it is much less 
> popular than it used to be.  In a few years, it will be a novelty.  Kind of like 
> the telegraphers of old.
> 
> Steve, K8SP
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 11:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Fw: [WestMichiganHams] FCC Eliminates Morse Code Requirement 
> (Finally!!)
> 
> 
> If ham radio becomes a part of the "norm" how is it any different from cb radio?
> If we're making it a part of the "norm" as a giveaway or some such why bother
> with the licensing requirements at all?  Personally I'm proud of the fact that I
> earned my extra license code and all but if it was just out there for anyone to
> grab it would become pretty meaningless like these buy-it-and-go degrees on the
> internet.  People just want it for no work and that's where its headed.
> Advocating a giveaway is one thing but advocating that amateur radio should
> become the "norm" is a slap in the fact to all amateirs.  Its a sad day when
> people with more earned knowledge than others are seen as being on a "high
> horse".
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
> 
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Colin McDonald wrote:
> 
> > Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 09:02:53 -0700
> > From: Colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]>
> > Reply-To: For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: Fw: [WestMichiganHams] FCC Eliminates Morse Code Requirement
> >     (Finally!!)
> >
> > hold on, are ham operators supposed to be some closed cult? or click that
> > only special privallaged persons can hope to be apart of?
> > Why can it not become a part of the norm instead of an odity?
> > Isn't that the whole idea behind amateur radio is to allow it to be
> > availible to anyone taking an interest at an amateur level?
> > I think there are way too many professional amateurs on HF who take the
> > whole thing way to seriously, and who also get bent out of shape when they
> > happen to find someone not up to their high horsed standards.
> > That is precisely the kind of operators that keep beginners away, or scare
> > them away quickly.
> > Perhaps amateur radio on HF is very much similar to an NFB type of
> > organization in its ideals.
> > Maybe we can begin to change that by allowing more normal everyday people on
> > there.
> > 73
> > Colin, CFA6BKX
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 8:53 AM
> > Subject: Re: Fw: [WestMichiganHams] FCC Eliminates Morse Code Requirement
> > (Finally!!)
> >
> >
> > > Howard, I agree.  Hams used to be set apart from other folks and with the
> > > dumbing down of requirements there is less and less difference between a
> > ham and
> > > anyone else.  The tech test is pretty simple and the general isn't much
> > harder
> > > in terms of accademics.
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> > >
> > > Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> > > web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
> >
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2