BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Sep 2006 02:56:38 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (174 lines)
really? funny how I haven't heard of any of these phantoms, or perhaps I 
should say, figments of your imagination more like it.

Simon


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: icom radios


> funny, I know about 15 people over there that won't sell to you and say 
> you
> don't have the license. 1 claims he knows you very well in fact.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 4:01 PM
> Subject: Re: icom radios
>
>
>>I am on the air perfectly legally dickhead, and there are a lot of people
>> here in the UK who are perfectly willing to sell to me, as here in the 
>> UK,
>> we have better things to do with our lives than give out aggravation.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 7:26 PM
>> Subject: Re: icom radios
>>
>>
>>> you want privacy, get off the internet. Email lists especially. I'm 
>>> done,
>>> I
>>> know the facts and until you prove otherwise, most others will know it
>>> too.
>>> You'll never prove otherwise though because there is no otherwise. 
>>> you're
>>> on
>>> the air illegally if at all, and will be caught, very few will sell to
>>> you
>>> and that's a good thing.
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:20 PM
>>> Subject: Re: icom radios
>>>
>>>
>>>> it is you, that should stop getting at me, all I am doing, is defending
>>>> myself and my privacy.
>>>>
>>>> Simon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 7:08 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: icom radios
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> well, you know how to stop it.
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>> From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:56 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: icom radios
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll have you know, that I had a lot of need to do it, as you just
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> shut your big gobs, and had to keep giving me aggravation.
>>>>>> if you had just put a sock in it, I wouldn't have done it, so you
>>>>>> asked
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> it plane and simple, as I am not prepared to keep putting up with
>>>>>> that,
>>>>>> so
>>>>>> if you want it to stop, I will with pleasure, when you lot stop 
>>>>>> giving
>>>>>> me
>>>>>> aggravation, spreading slander about me, and bullying me, it is as
>>>>>> easy
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Simon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 6:35 PM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: icom radios
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you didn't have any need to do what you did, it was uncalled for and
>>>>>>> proved
>>>>>>> once and for all the truth. If in fact you are a real license holder
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>> kind, you're a disgrace to it.
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>>>> From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:23 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: icom radios
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you lot asked for it in the first place, by giving me all the
>>>>>>>> aggravation
>>>>>>>> you did, so don't start whining about it now, as if you hadn't
>>>>>>>> started
>>>>>>>> giving it in the first place, I would have had no need to do what I
>>>>>>>> did,
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> lot drove me to it as well you know.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Simon
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>>>>> From: "Jim Johnson" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:23 PM
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: icom radios
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> agreed!!
>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>>>>>> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:50 AM
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: icom radios
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To the moderator, please get Simon off this list!  Enough is
>>>>>>>>>> enough.  That language alone is enough reason!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>>>>>>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>>>>>> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/450 - Release Date:
>>>>>>>>>> 9/18/2006
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>>>>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>>>>>> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/450 - Release Date:
>>>>>>>>>> 9/18/2006
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2