XM has way fewer drop outs because of how they deliver the signal. XM also
has much better music variety, and the old time radio shows channel is
considerably better from what I've been told, I'm not sure on the old time
radio channel though. The other you need only look at the channel listings
to see and the signal, again, look at the FAQ's and it's apparent. My
brother has serius and it's alright, but the only thing is has I want is the
NASCAR races after this season. Also, XM has a real portable radio, like a
walkman style and serius can't come close to that yet yet. They have
something that will record and you can listen later, but not that you can
walk around with while listening to it and the way they deliver signals
might be a huge part of that. XM actually has repeaters on the ground to get
the signal in to the tough spots where as serius doesn't, or didn't when I
signed up for XM. From where my brother has drop outs, I'd say they still
don't.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: BJS XM Radio needs our help
> WHat can you get on XM that you can't get on Serious? I am thinking of
> subscribing to one or ther other. My step dad likes Serious, but I've
> heard good and bad things about both XM a and Serious.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, John Miller wrote:
>
>> for my purposes, XM puts serious in the toilet though unfortunately, I'll
>> have to get serius soon too for my NASCAR coverage on vacations and stuff
>> but I really don't want to since they have nothing else I like, and a
>> couple
>> things I absolutely don't want.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 2:24 PM
>> Subject: Re: BJS XM Radio needs our help
>>
>>
>> > AM/FM radio is dying, and I've heard that Serious is better then XM.
>> > Stations that have been really self suficient have been taken over by
>> > corporations. On another note, Clear Channel seems to have a political
>> > message. The conservatives get to be on these powerful stations, and
>> > then
>> > things like Air America are on weak stations.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Harvey wrote:
>> >
>> >> I don't have XM either, but I do care because corporate giants like
>> >> Clear
>> >> Channel and others have virtually ruined commercial broadcasting and
>> >> have
>> >> bought off the FCC. Now that millions have gone to satellite for
>> >> which
>> >> they
>> >> are willing to pay, instead of playing fair by letting the marketplace
>> >> decide things, and waking up and smelling the coffee, they want to
>> >> play
>> >> dirty and restrict satellite radio and ruin it as they have done to
>> >> commercial radio just because they are too cheap and lazy to get off
>> >> their
>> >> corporate butts and give the listeners what they want.
>> >> Harvey
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
|
