BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
T Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:26:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
    Verry well said, Phil.  LONG LIVE CW!

Let's do all we can to keep it alive.

Here's to the code, from a fellow CW op.

73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Scovell" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 12:43 AM
Subject: CW Issue


> Years ago, when they started fiddling around with the code requirements, I
> knew they would eventually eliminate it all together.  Although I have
> literally gone for years without making a side band contact now, since CW
> has always been my favorite, I have never cared if they got rid of the
> testing for the code or not.  Only those wishing to learn and enjoy that
> mode of communications will be in the CW bands now and there will be, as
it
> has been going down the last 20 years, fewer and fewer CW operators.
> Eventually, when the last of us dies out, I guess everything will be phone
> and digital stuff.  I won't care then because I'll be gone anyhow.  Until
> then, just tune the bands during a CW contest and try and tell me CW is
> dead.  I frankly never thought I would see the day there was no CW test
and
> I pray I never see the day the code is band from the air but it wouldn't
> surprise me.
>
> Phil.
> K0NX
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2