BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Cable Channel 18
From:
Walt Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Dec 2006 19:14:43 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
Phil -

I think you've pretty well got it nailed. The burden of proof is always on 
the side of the person doing the complaining and in addition to the FCC and 
ARRL, they might want to talk to a lawyer about a nice, firm letter to the 
building superintendent, pointing out their legal rights if they were to be 
evicted. Perhaps there's a local lawyer who's also a licensed amateur 
(notice how I managed to avoid using "lawyer" and "ham" in the same 
sentence?).

--
Walt Smith - Clearwater, FL
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2