Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:12:44 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
lol exactly.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: Taking the radio out of ham radio
>I agree. They should have a big sign that comes up or something and
> says "lets play radio!" Gee, lets make telephones look like tranceivers
> and we can pretend we're on the radio while on the phone.
> 73s
> Butch Bussen
> wa0vjr
>
> On Wed, 1 Nov
> 2006, John Miller wrote:
>
>> but this idiot that invented this doesn't have any RF involved at all so
>> it's not radio in the least and anyone who thinks it is needs to look at
>> what radio is. Personally, I think anyone who would sign up or anything
>> with
>> them should lose their license but that's JMO.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Christopher Moore" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:38 AM
>> Subject: Re: Taking the radio out of ham radio
>>
>>
>>> Buddy,
>>> Since you signed up for the 90 day free trial, give us a report on how
>>> it work and whether the transceiver software is accessible. They said
>>> there were some shortcut keys to help the visually impaired.
>>>
>>> The one nice thing about this product is you don't need to mess around
>>> with your router ports as you do with echolink. you can also make qso's
>>> with cw.
>>>
>>> I think the purists might argue that anything that use voip is NOT ham
>>> radio.
>>>
>>> 73 Chris w1gm
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|