Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:31:15 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Simon,
The legal definition of slander is stating something about someone that one
knows is false. Since you won't divulge your call, if you have one, nobody
is committing slander because nobody is typing any knowingly false
statements. Check with a barrister and get your facts straight. Until you
do, get lost!
Steve, K8SP
----- Original Message -----
From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 10:10 PM
Subject: Re: icom radios
> lets get the facts strait now, nothing has been proved at all, so it is
> still slander.
> the only pane, is you and all those who keep giving out the aggravation,
> either go pick on someone else, or better still, go find something else to
> do with your life.
>
> Simon
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 11:25 PM
> Subject: Re: icom radios
>
>
>>Their is no slander in truth.
>>Pain maybe, but truth has been proven beyond a doubt here.
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/451 - Release Date: 9/19/2006
>
|
|
|