Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:24:50 -0400 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I heard some place that XM tended to be more conservative though then
Serious?
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, John Miller wrote:
> not as of a year and a half ago when I signed up, XM had a lot more then and
> from the channel list on the site, if that's accurate, XM still has the huge
> lead in the music channels.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:18 PM
> Subject: Re: e-skip
>
>
> >I have heard Serious is doing better then XM anyway and has m more
> > choice.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, John Miller wrote:
> >
> >> Mine is pretty close to walkman. I have a home unit too which I use more
> >> but
> >> they say I can leave my portable on the home stand a lot and only take it
> >> out when I use it if I want with out hurting the battery so I might get
> >> rid
> >> of the home one and start doing that. On vacation the portable is all
> >> I'll
> >> have anyway, it sure did a good job for me last year. I like XM, I sure
> >> hate
> >> to have to switch but with NASCAR coverage doing to Sirius, I'll have to.
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:52 PM
> >> Subject: Re: e-skip
> >>
> >>
> >> > Serious will have to get a good portable to have as much competition as
> >> > XM. A friend of mine even said that XM has even a walkman model or
> >> > will
> >> > soon.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
|
|
|