i am hopeless am i not linda? but we agree on hawaii.
the big Island sure is nice. if only money were no
object. 
go ahead and buy if the vocano gets you, it'll only
hurt for a short time. -:)

--- Linda Walker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Peter
> 
> Great try at Ken's logic. I consider him hopeless on
> the issues tho.
> Have any advice on Hawaii as I am thinking of
> purchasing there?
> On the Big Island which has an active rift zone but
> also areas 
> outside of the rift. Gosh what areas will benefit
> from the change. I 
> am going to the site you suggested for lay people
> now.
> 
> 
> At 07:44 AM 9/21/2007, you wrote:
> >On 9/21/07, Trisha Cummings <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> > > Peter,
> > >
> > >    What is the mosr reliable research source you
> have seen on 
> > whether or not we have
> > > reached the point of no return already - or its
> just around the 
> > corner we are turning now.
> > > Here is the point where I am seeing more
> variations in the 
> > scientists community. I
> > > know the Antartic ice sheets Larson A and B -
> truly have 
> > signalled a serious point
> > > in the cycle.
> > >
> >
> >The upcoming IPCC report tries to give a global
> consensus picture of
> >what might happen, but apparently isn't perfect.
> There's an
> >explanation of why not that also sort of summarizes
> the expected
> >climate impact over the next century in near
> laymans terms here:
> >
>
>http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/08/regional-climate-projections/#more-442
> >
> >It's a bit dense, Scientific American regularly
> produces articles that
> >are pretty easy to read and you might want to wade
> through their site
> >for their articles though I think some of them
> require a subscription.
> >  www.reaclimate.com is a interesting web site, but
> clearly skeptic
> >unfriendly.  I trust it, but only because one is
> free to follow the
> >debate and they link to the papers in question.
> However, if you don't
> >want to dig into the actual Nature, Science or
> Journal of Geophysical
> >Research then Scientific American may be the places
> to start.
> >
> >You may notice I'm sort of ducking your question. 
> That's because I
> >don't think there's a single easy answer. Best I
> can tell, some parts
> >of the world are already in trouble (personally I
> wouldn't  buy land
> >in the New Orleans or the Florida Keys) and parts
> may not suffer
> >adverse effects for 100+ years or may even benefit.
>  I don't think
> >there is a single globally applicable answer to
> your question.
> >
> >--
> >Peter Hunsberger
> >
> >-----------------------
> >
> >To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> list, go here:
> >
>
>http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> 
> -----------------------
> 
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> list, go here:
> 
>
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> 



       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/  

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy