Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | ray t. mahorney |
Date: | Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:41:46 -0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
figure you oughta be able to get good performance out of an 8 foot Shakespeare mounted on either the back deck or on
some type of side mount.
Ray T. Mahorney
WA4WGA
http://www.ifbyphone.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Humbert" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: January 15, 2007 07:09
Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] antenna building
Yes, I know, I sound like a trader. My wife and I just got a 32 foot motor
home. I might be wrong but I think CB is going to be better for finding a
place to park and good food in a new area. At least I don't hear any
conversation about that topic on my H.T. It has bin about 30 years since I
had a CB and I'm wondering if anyone has a suggestion for a good antenna for
a motor home. By now, the controversy about the best kind and location
should be solved and I shouldn't have to learn by error all over again.
Thanks for any help. I'll still keep my THF6a with us as we travel.
----- Original Message -----
From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: antenna building
> Here in the uk there is talk of 10watts being permitted from routers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Louis Kim Kline
> Sent: 13 January 2007 18:17
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: antenna building
>
> Hi.
>
> Sure you can, if you know what wavelength you are working with and a few
> construction principles for the frequencies in question. For example, as
> you get into the microwave ranges, construction techniques change quite a
> bit because inductive reactance becomes much more of an issue at higher
> frequencies. However, if you understand the principles involved, you can
> make an antenna for anything. Whether it is ham radio, or something else
> is irrelevant.
>
> One thing you do have to watch though is whether or not the device you are
> making the antenna for is a Part 15 device. That is because the gain of
> the supplied antenna is figured into the Part 15 specification, and if you
> put an antenna with more gain on it and cause interference to some other
> device, you will held to be at fault and in violation of FCC rules because
> you have violated the type acceptance of that device by putting a gain
> antenna on it.
>
> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>
>
> At 02:21 PM 1/12/2007 -0600, you wrote:
>>I am studying for my general class license. I got to the chapters on
>>antenna design. I find this very fascinating. I am curious now. If
>>you can build an antenna to work for ham radio, can you build an antenna
>>to work for a wireless router? If not why?
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.10/624 - Release Date: 1/12/2007
>>2:04 PM
>
> Louis Kim Kline
> A.R.S. K2LKK
> Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> Work Telephone: (585) 697-5753
>
> __________ NOD32 1.1200 (20050823) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
|
|
|